Apartments in New York City aren’t recognized for being particularly spacious, or for being particularly low-cost.
Alaina Randazzo was interviewed by TikToker Caleb Simpson, who typically asks New Yorkers on the road how a lot they pay for his or her residences, and if he can take a tour as a part of his bit.
Randazzo then takes viewers inside her Midtown Manhattan condominium because the digicam shoots down on her from above. Viewers can see the one room (if you happen to may even name it that) that mixes one burner on a stovetop, some shelf house, and a loveseat.
When Randazzo (who Simpson says “is 5’5 on a good day”) lies down on the ground, her full physique is simply too lengthy to even match the size from wall to wall.
“No window, but like, we’re good,” Randazzo notes, after pointing to a skylight and her lofted mattress.
Viewers had a subject day, seemingly cut up equally between emotions of awe and horror.
“I’m too claustrophobic for this,” one consumer stated.
“I’d actually love to live there,” one other disagreed.
New Yorkers additionally jadedly flooded the feedback saying that paying that little for hire in Manhattan continues to be a “steal” whatever the condominium measurement.
“This is solid. Anyone who doesn’t think so doesn’t understand opportunity cost,” one commenter even wrote. “Living that cheap in Midtown has such a high ROI.”
Many identified that Randazzo did not point out something about having a rest room, which appeared to be regarding, although she did make clear on her personal TikTok web page that she makes use of a shared toilet within the hallway.
@alainarandazzox Replying to @brandondoesntcode
She additionally revealed that she shares the condominium along with her canine.
According to most recent data, the typical hire for a one-bedroom condominium in NYC proper now’s round $3,927, up about 27% from the identical time final 12 months.
The most costly neighborhood for a one bed room condominium in New York proper now’s the Upper West Side the place the typical one-bedroom goes for $4,198 — about $3,548 greater than what Randazzo is paying.
Tiny or not, that is actually no cash being wasted on hire!